Governance Charter Editorial Independence & Revenue Firewall

Editorial Independence & The Revenue Firewall

1. Statement of Principle

Bleeding Pages maintains absolute editorial independence. The decision to accept, revise, or reject a submitted manuscript rests exclusively with the Editor-in-Chief and Section Editors, guided by the recommendations of independent peer reviewers. Commercial interests, sponsorships, institutional subscriptions, reader memberships, or editorial assessments purchased by authors exert zero influence on editorial decisions.

2. The Revenue Firewall (§8)

In strict fulfillment of Section 8 of our governing brief:

Firewall Rule (§8)

Paid services and memberships must never influence acceptance. Reviewers and editors cannot see whether an author bought anything. That data is separated at the database permission level. Published scholarly articles stay openly readable; revenue comes from memberships, subscriptions, and print editions, not from paywalling the record.

Architectural Enforcement:

3. Recusal and Conflicts of Interest

Any editor with a personal, academic, or financial relationship with an author—including thesis supervision within the past 5 years, co-authorship within the past 3 years, or familial relation—must formally recuse themselves from handling the submission. The manuscript is reassigned by the Managing Editor to an independent section editor.