Scholarly Record
Corrigenda & Retraction Protocols
Draft for Owner and Legal Review
This document codifies the post-publication corrections policy aligned with COPE guidelines and Crossref Crossmark protocols. Draft prepared for owner and legal review.
Corrections, Errata & Retractions Protocol
1. The Integrity of the Permanent Record
Bleeding Pages recognizes that published scholarly literature constitutes a permanent historical record. Once an article is published with an assigned Digital Object Identifier (DOI), it cannot be altered, replaced, or removed without a formal public notice.
2. Categories of Post-Publication Notices
| Notice Type | Applicable Circumstance | Permanent Procedure |
|---|---|---|
| Corrigendum | Errors introduced by the author (e.g. incorrect translation citation, erroneous date) that do not invalidate the findings. | Published as a numbered notice linked bidirectionally to the original article with its own Crossref DOI. |
| Erratum | Errors introduced during typesetting or editorial production (e.g. truncated paragraph, misspelled author affiliation). | Correction notice appended to the article record and published in the next regular issue. |
| Addendum | Additional explanatory notes or archival permissions granted post-publication. | Linked addendum document appended to the article dossier. |
| Retraction | Severe scholarly malpractice: plagiarism, fabricated data, undisclosed AI synthesis, or unauthorized translation infringement. | Formal Retraction Notice published. The original PDF is watermarked "RETRACTED" on every page but preserved for indexing auditability. |
3. The Public Corrections Ledger
Every article page anatomy includes a dedicated "Corrections & Version History" block. If any post-publication revision occurs, the date, authorized editor, and exact nature of the change are transparently logged for scholars and citation indexers.